2023 gmc terrain vs chevy equinox

2022 Chevrolet Equinox

Show

2022 GMC Terrain

#15 in Mid-Size SUVs

Add Vehicle
Get Your Price Get Your Price

Select style

AWD 4-Door LS w/1LS

StyleMPG CityMPG HwyInvoiceMSRP
Equinox AWD 4-Door LS w/1LS 25 30 $26,616 $27,900
Equinox AWD 4-Door LT w/1LT 25 30 $27,666 $29,000
Equinox AWD 4-Door Premier 25 30 $31,577 $33,100
Equinox AWD 4-Door RS 25 30 $30,718 $32,200
Equinox FWD 4-Door LS w/1LS 26 31 $25,090 $26,300
Equinox FWD 4-Door LT w/1LT 26 31 $26,139 $27,400
Equinox FWD 4-Door Premier 26 31 $30,051 $31,500
Equinox FWD 4-Door RS 26 31 $29,192 $30,600

Select style

AWD 4-Door AT4

StyleMPG CityMPG HwyInvoiceMSRP
Terrain AWD 4-Door AT4 25 28 $32,913 $34,500
Terrain AWD 4-Door Denali 25 28 $35,393 $37,100
Terrain AWD 4-Door SLE 25 28 $28,620 $30,000
Terrain AWD 4-Door SLT 25 28 $32,436 $34,000
Terrain FWD 4-Door SLE 25 30 $27,093 $28,400
Terrain FWD 4-Door SLT 25 30 $30,909 $32,400

Show Only Differences

Pricing

Invoice Price

$26,616

$32,913

Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price

$27,900

$34,500

Monthly Payment Estimate

$465 / month

$575 / month

The Car Connection's Take

TCC Rating

6.2

Read Our Full Review

6.3

Read Our Full Review

TCC’s Bottom Line

The 2022 Chevy Equinox secures its passengers well but doesn’t stand out among snappier, techier crossover SUVs. The 2022 GMC Terrain leans into urbane utility, and away from truck-like ruggedness.

TCC Likes

  • Swell interior room
  • A good value in LT spec
  • Wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto

  • Good road manners
  • Snappy style
  • Solid infotainment interface

TCC Dislikes

  • Anonymous shapes
  • Middle-grade interior trim
  • Slim powertrain pickings

  • Power’s lacking
  • Toggle-shift transmission
  • Annoying all-wheel-drive system

Fuel Economy

City

25 mpg 25 mpg

Highway

30 mpg 28 mpg

Vehicle

EPA Classification

4WD Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD Sport Utility Vehicle

Interior Dimensions

Second Shoulder Room (in)

55.5 55.6

Front Leg Room (in)

40.9 40.9

Passenger Volume (ft³)

103.5 103.2

Front Hip Room (in)

54.2 54.4

Second Leg Room (in)

39.9 39.7

Front Head Room (in)

40 40.0

Passenger Capacity

5 5

Second Hip Room (in)

51.7 51.8

Front Shoulder Room (in)

57.2 57.2

Second Head Room (in)

38.5 38.5

Exterior Dimensions

Height, Overall (in)

65.4 65.4

Liftover Height (in)

- TBD - - TBD -

Track Width, Rear (in)

62.2 62.5

Wheelbase (in)

107.3 107.3

Rear Door Opening Height (in)

- TBD - - TBD -

Width, Max w/o mirrors (in)

72.6 72.4

Track Width, Front (in)

62.2 62.3

Min Ground Clearance (in)

7.9 7.90

Length, Overall (in)

183.1 182.3

Rear Door Opening Width (in)

- TBD - - TBD -

Cargo Area Dimensions

Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 2 (in)

- TBD - - TBD -

Cargo Volume to Seat 2 (ft³)

29.9 29.6

Cargo Area Width @ Beltline (in)

- TBD - - TBD -

Cargo Box (Area) Height (in)

- TBD - - TBD -

Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 1 (in)

- TBD - - TBD -

Cargo Volume to Seat 1 (ft³)

63.9 63.3

Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 3 (in)

NA NA

Cargo Volume to Seat 3 (ft³)

NA NA

Cargo Box Width @ Wheelhousings (in)

- TBD - - TBD -

Brakes

Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness (in)

11.3 x - TBD - 11.3 x - TBD -

Brake Type

Pwr Pwr

Rear Drum Diam x Width (in)

NA NA

Disc - Front (Yes or )

Yes Yes

Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness (in)

11.8 x - TBD - 11.8 x - TBD -

Drum - Rear (Yes or )

NA NA

Brake ABS System

4-Wheel 4-Wheel

Disc - Rear (Yes or )

Yes Yes

Fuel Tank

Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx (gal)

15.6 15.6

Steering

Steering Type

Pwr Electric Rack & Pinion

Lock to Lock Turns (Steering)

- TBD - - TBD -

Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall (ft)

- TBD - - TBD -

Steering Ratio (:1), Overall

- TBD - - TBD -

Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb (ft)

37.4 37.4

Tires

Spare Tire Size

T135/70R16 -

Front Tire Order Code

5CY QEN

Spare Tire Order Code

RJA RJA

Rear Tire Size

P225/65R17 P225/65R17

Rear Tire Order Code

5CY QEN

Front Tire Size

P225/65R17 P225/65R17

Trailering

Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt. (lbs)

1500 1500

Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt. (lbs)

1500 1500

Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt. (lbs)

150 150

Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt. (lbs)

150 150

Weight Information

Base Curb Weight (lbs)

3465 3659

Wheels

Rear Wheel Size (in)

17 x - TBD - 17 x 7.0

Front Wheel Material

Aluminum Aluminum

Spare Wheel Material

Steel Steel

Front Wheel Size (in)

17 x - TBD - 17 x 7.0

Spare Wheel Size (in)

16 x -TBD - 16 X - TBD -

Rear Wheel Material

Aluminum Aluminum

Cooling System

Total Cooling System Capacity (qts)

- TBD - - TBD -

Electrical

Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)

- TBD - - TBD -

Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)

- TBD - - TBD -

Engine

Engine Type

Turbocharged Gas I4 Turbocharged Gas

Fuel System

Direct Injection Direct Injection

SAE Net Torque @ RPM

203 @ 2000-4000 203 @ 2000 - 4000

Engine Order Code

LYX LYX

Displacement

1.5L/92 1.5L/92

SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM

170 @ 5600 170 @ 5600

Mileage

Fuel Economy Est-Combined (MPG)

27 26

EPA Fuel Economy Est - Hwy (MPG)

30 28

EPA Fuel Economy Est - City (MPG)

25 25

Transmission

Trans Order Code

MNH M3U

Final Drive Axle Ratio (:1)

3.87 3.47

Fourth Gear Ratio (:1)

1.446 2.44

Trans Description Cont.

Automatic Automatic

Transfer Case Gear Ratio (:1), Low

- TBD - - TBD -

Drivetrain

All Wheel Drive All Wheel Drive

Sixth Gear Ratio (:1)

0.746 1.44

First Gear Ratio (:1)

4.584 4.69

Clutch Size (in)

NA NA

Third Gear Ratio (:1)

1.912 3.01

Trans Type

6 9

Transfer Case Gear Ratio (:1), High

- TBD - - TBD -

Fifth Gear Ratio (:1)

1.00 1.92

Trans Description Cont. Again

NA NA

Reverse Ratio (:1)

2.94 2.96

Second Gear Ratio (:1)

2.964 3.31

Ninth Gear Ratio (:1)

- 0.62

Eighth Gear Ratio (:1)

- 0.75

Seventh Gear Ratio (:1)

- 1.00

Summary

Vehicle Name

Chevrolet Equinox GMC Terrain

Body Style

Sport Utility Vehicle Sport Utility

Suspension

Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.)

NA NA

Shock Absorber Diameter - Rear (mm)

N/A - TBD -

Suspension Type - Front

MacPherson Strut MacPherson Strut

Stabilizer Bar Diameter - Rear (in)

- TBD - - TBD -

Suspension Type - Front (Cont.)

NA NA

Shock Absorber Diameter - Front (mm)

N/A - TBD -

Stabilizer Bar Diameter - Front (in)

- TBD - - TBD -

Suspension Type - Rear

Four-Link 4-Link

Emissions

Tons/yr of CO2 Emissions @ 15K mi/year

6.5 6.8

Crash Test Ratings

Overall Rating

Overall Frontal Barrier Crash Rating

Frontal Barrier Crash Rating Driver

Frontal Barrier Crash Rating Passenger

Overall Side Crash Rating

Side Barrier Rating

Side Barrier Rating Driver

Side Barrier Rating Passenger Rear Seat

Side Pole Rating Driver Front Seat

Combined Side Rating Front Seat

Combined Side Rating Rear Seat

Rollover Rating

2022 Chevrolet Equinox

  • 2022 Equinox in stock; 2023s can be ordered
  • Lease: From $239/mo
  • Rebates: $1,200 off for all buyers
  • Finance: From 1.9% APR

Get Your Price

2022 GMC Terrain

  • 2022 Terrain in stock; 2023s coming soon
  • Lease: From $249/mo
  • Rebates: Up to $1,000 off
  • Finance: From 0% APR

Get Your Price

Is the GMC Terrain comparable to the Chevy Equinox?

Is Chevy Equinox Same as GMC Terrain? Technically, the Terrain is the Equinox twin with the same interior and driving stuffing, but with a completely different appearance. Terrain received from Equinox not only the GM Theta platform but also a similar line of engines and automatic transmissions.

Is a GMC Terrain bigger than a Chevy Equinox?

GMC Terrain Dimensions & Size. Although the 2022 Chevy Equinox and 2022 GMC Terrain are similar in size, each SUV has a unique exterior design. The Equinox sports a sleek, modern style with a length of 183.1 inches while the Terrain boasts a more muscular design and a 182.3-inch length.

What is the GMC Terrain comparable to?

Chevrolet Equinox. The Chevrolet Equinox is very similar to the Terrain. Both SUVs come with a comparable list of standard and available features, about the same amount of passenger and cargo room, and identical engines.

What is the Chevy Equinox equivalent to?

RAV4. The Chevy Equinox and the Toyota RAV4 are close contenders within the SUV crossover competitive segment. Both vehicles offer great fuel efficiency, handling, comfortable passenger and cargo space, and impressive trim levels, so choosing one over the other may be difficult.