I've been a huge Amazfit fan myself and never planned to ever buy a "name brand" watch due to the outrageous prices. A few weeks ago when that crazy sale popped up on the GW3 (I paid $167 after taxes for my LTE model) I picked one up. I can't speak in comparison of the GTR2 directly but in comparison to my experience with my other Amazfit watches, it was night and day.
The overall feel and function just seemed to work way better. The companion app is leaps better, the way it connects and disconnects if you leave the area is way better, the bluetooth distance is way better. It's no comparison, the GW is way better in my opinion.
On that note, there's the price point. For the price, I wouldn't hesitate to get an Amazfit watch or recommend one. If I was going to spring the money though, I would without a doubt go with the GW.
Home / Smart watch / Amazfit GTR 2 Sport Edition vs Samsung Galaxy Watch Active2 44mm
We compared the characteristics of Amazfit GTR 2 Sport Edition and Samsung Galaxy Watch Active2 44mm and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2022 year.
Amazfit GTR 2 Sport Edition benefits
Price at the time of release |
187.5 USD -147.4 USD (-44%) better vs 334.9 USD |
Price-quality ratio |
32.3 % 6.5 % (25.2%) better vs 25.8 % |
The duration of the work |
912 h 781 h (596.2%) better vs 131 h |
Battery Capacity |
471 mAh 131 mAh (38.5%) better vs 340 mAh |
Thickness |
10.7 mm -0.2 mm (-1.8%) better vs 10.9 mm |
Samsung Galaxy Watch Active2 44mm benefits
Diagonal (inch) |
1.4 '' 0.01 '' (0.7%) better vs 1.39 '' |
Video playback |
vs |
Width |
44 mm -2.4 mm (-5.2%) better vs 46.4 mm |
Length |
44 mm -2.4 mm (-5.2%) better vs 46.4 mm |
Weight |
30 g -1.5 g (-4.8%) better vs 31.5 g |
Comparison of all specifications
General parameters | |
Price at the time of release | |
187.5 USD -147.4 USD (-44%) better | 334.9 USD |
Price-quality ratio The sum of all the advantages of the device divided by its price. The higher the%, the better the quality per unit price in comparison with all analogues. | |
32.3 % 6.5 % (25.2%) better | 25.8 % |
Display | |
Display availability | |
The manufacturing technology of the LCD screen | |
AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
Color display | |
Diagonal (inch) The larger the diagonal of the smart watch, the more information fits on the display. | |
1.39 '' | 1.4 '' 0.01 '' (0.7%) better |
Screen resolution The first number is the number of pixels horizontally, the second is vertical. The higher the resolution, the clearer the picture on the screen. | |
454x454 | 360х360 |
Touch screen display The presence of a touch screen allows you to control the functions of a smart watch using touch, as in most modern smartphones. | |
Case and strap | |
Degree of protection | |
IP68 | IP68 |
Removable strap | |
Water resistant The larger the characteristic, the more pressure the device can withstand under water. The water pressure increases by one atmosphere (1 bar) every 10 meters of diving depth. | |
5 Bar | 5 Bar |
System | |
Amount of RAM | |
no data | 768 Mb |
The amount of internal memory | |
no data | 4 Gb |
Processor Frequency | |
no data | 1150 MHz |
Number of cores | |
no data | 2 |
Communication and switching | |
Wireless connection | |
Bluetooth | Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, NFC |
GPS | |
Slot for a SIM card | |
Bluetooth version | |
5 | 5 |
Functions | |
Playing audio | |
Video playback | |
Power and charging | |
The duration of the work The operating time on one battery charge, the more - the higher the autonomy of the device, for example, it can be useful for travel and long trips without recharging. | |
912 h 781 h (596.2%) better | 131 h |
Battery Capacity | |
471 mAh 131 mAh (38.5%) better | 340 mAh |
Charging time | |
2.5 h | no data |
Dimensions, weight | |
Width | |
46.4 mm | 44 mm -2.4 mm (-5.2%) better |
Length | |
46.4 mm | 44 mm -2.4 mm (-5.2%) better |
Thickness | |
10.7 mm -0.2 mm (-1.8%) better | 10.9 mm |
Weight | |
31.5 g | 30 g -1.5 g (-4.8%) better |