Intentional infliction of emotional distress california civil code

Section 1714.01 - Domestic partners entitle to recover damages for negligent infliction of emotional distress
(a) Domestic partners shall be entitled to recover damages for negligent infliction of emotional distress to the same extent that spouses are entitled to do so under California law.
(b) For the purpose of this section, "domestic partners" has the meaning provided in Section 297 of the Family Code.

Ca. Civ. Code § 1714.01

Added by Stats 2001 ch 893 (AB 25), s 1, eff. 1/1/2002.

A cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress consists of: (1) outrageous conduct by the defendant with the intention to cause or reckless disregard of the probability of causing emotional distress, (2) severe emotional suffering and (3) actual and proximate causation of the emotional distress.

A cause of action for negligent infliction of emotional distress consists of: (1) a duty of care owed by the defendant to the plaintiff, (2) breach of that duty by the defendant resulting in severe emotional suffering and (3) actual and proximate causation of severe emotional distress.

Sound familiar?

Intentional or negligent infliction of emotional distress is a common cause of action (claim) in SLAPPs. Although not all such claims are subject to the anti-SLAPP law, if you’ve been sued for intentional or negligent infliction of emotional distress, you may well have been SLAPPed.

The two cases below are examples of SLAPPs where CASP successfully defended clients who were sued for infliction of emotional distress.

Wong v. Jing
(2010, 6th District – 189 Cal. App. 4th 1354; 117 Cal. Rptr. 3d 747)

The trial court denied an anti-SLAPP motion to strike a dentist’s claims of libel per se and intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress, filed against two parents and Yelp!, arising from a negative review on Yelp! regarding the dentist’s treatment of the parents’ child.  The Court of Appeal held that all of the claims were subject to the anti-SLAPP law and that six of the seven claims were without merit.

Coltrain v. Shewalter
(2003, 4th District – 66 Cal.App.4th 94, 77 Cal.Rptr.2d 600)

Our clients, the neighbors of an apartment complex, filed nuisance actions in small claims court against the owners of the complex, after unsuccessful attempts to abate alleged criminal activity and harassment by residents of the complex. In retaliation, the owners of the complex sued our clients for trade libel, defamation, and intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress. After our clients filed an anti-SLAPP motion, the plaintiffs dismissed their complaint. The Court of Appeal found that our clients were targets of a SLAPP and were entitled to recover our attorneys fees, even though the plaintiffs dismissed the complaint.

The information on this website is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. The information here is meant to provide general information to the public.

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes, a free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes, visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

(a) Domestic partners shall be entitled to recover damages for negligent infliction of emotional distress to the same extent that spouses are entitled to do so under California law.

Cite this article: FindLaw.com - California Code, Civil Code - CIV § 1714.01 - last updated January 01, 2019 | https://codes.findlaw.com/ca/civil-code/civ-sect-1714-01.html

FindLaw Codes may not reflect the most recent version of the law in your jurisdiction. Please verify the status of the code you are researching with the state legislature or via Westlaw before relying on it for your legal needs.

Intentional infliction of emotional distress california civil code
In California, if a person intends his or her conduct to cause an emotional, rather than a physical, injury to another individual, then he or she can be held liable for damages that occur as a result. Being the target of the intentional infliction of emotional distress can have severe consequences on a person’s quality of life, so if you have been a victim of such a crime, it is imperative that you contact an experienced attorney who can explain your legal options.

Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress

To hold a person liable for the intentional infliction of emotional distress requires a showing that: 

  • The defendant’s conduct was outrageous; and
  • The defendant intended to cause emotional distress.

Alternatively, a plaintiff may establish the intentional infliction of emotional distress by showing that: 

  • The defendant acted with reckless disregard of the probability that the plaintiff would suffer emotional distress;
  • The defendant knew that the plaintiff was present when the conduct occurred;
  • The plaintiff suffered severe emotional distress; and
  • The defendant’s conduct was a substantial factor in causing the plaintiff’s severe emotional distress.

Severe Emotional Distress

Severe emotional distress means that the distress is so substantial or enduring that no reasonable person could be expected to endure it. It includes highly unpleasant mental reactions, such as fright, grief, shame, anger, or worry. Whether emotional distress rises to the level of “severe” is a question of fact for the jury.

Outrageous Conduct

Conduct is considered outrageous when it is so extreme that a reasonable person would find it intolerable. Behavior may be considered outrageous if a defendant: 

  • Abuses a relation or position that gives him or her power to damage the plaintiff’s interests;
  • Knows the plaintiff is susceptible to injuries through mental distress; or
  • Acts intentionally or unreasonably with the recognition that the acts are likely to result in illness through mental distress. 

Often, conduct is considered outrageous when it involves abuse of certain types of relationships, including:

  • Employer-employee;
  • Insurer-insured;
  • Landlord-tenant;
  • Hospital-patient;
  • Attorney-client;
  • Collecting creditors; and
  • Religious institutions. 

Generally, the use of profanity, obscenity, or abuse is not enough, without circumstances of aggravation, to reach the level of “outrageous.”

Damages

Someone who has suffered from an intentional infliction of emotional distress can recover compensatory damages, even when no physical injury is suffered or monetary loss sustained.

An injury does not have to be physical to have a profound impact on a person’s life. Emotional injuries can be just as painful as many types of physical wounds, and are sometimes more difficult to treat.

If you or someone you know was the victim of an intentional infliction of emotional distress, an attorney can help you recover compensation for your harm. Please contact the Monterey County personal injury attorneys at Corsiglia, McMahon & Allard, L.L.P. for a free consultation.

Sources

  • Intentional infliction of emotional distress

What is the statute of limitations in California for intentional infliction of emotional distress?

In cases where the action by a wrongdoer is intentional or with reckless disregard, you may have a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED). Under California's statute of limitations, you have two years after the incident to file this type of personal injury lawsuit in court.

Can you sue someone for emotional distress in California?

In California, victims who suffer emotional distress because of another person's conduct can file a lawsuit for the intentional infliction of emotional distress. There is no requirement that a victim suffers a physical injury.

What are the four elements of an intentional infliction of emotional distress claim?

The tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress has four elements: (1) the defendant must act intentionally or recklessly; (2) the defendant's conduct must be extreme and outrageous; and (3) the conduct must be the cause (4) of severe emotional distress.

How do you prove intentional infliction of emotional distress?

The Elements of the Tort of Intentional Infliction of Mental Suffering:.
The Defendant's conduct was flagrant and outrageous;.
The Defendant's conduct was calculated to harm the Plaintiff; and..
The Defendant's conduct caused the Plaintiff to suffer a visible and provable illness..